Monthly Archives: October 2011

Blotmonath

Blotmonath starts 29/10/11

The Month Of Sacrifice 

-Bede, Ecclesiastical History, Book I Chapter 30 :-

 

When the grass stops growing in the late autumn or early winter in north-western Europe, the supply of food available for cattle falls dramatically. It is still possible to pasture a few animals outdoors, provided they are hardy enough to survive the winter weather, but the number will be limited because the vegetation that is already there has to last them until the new growth starts again next spring.

Keeping any larger number of cattle over winter requires the provision of winter fodder. This was traditionally hay, long grass cut in the lush days of summer and dried in the sun for winter storage. But hay is time-consuming to make, and in a wet summer it can be difficult (if not impossible) to dry it properly. The hay supply is also limited by the supply of grass available for cutting in the summer. All of this means the supply of food available for livestock during the winter would be a lot less than that available during the summer. Demand could be reduced to some extent if the cows went dry in the winter, as a cow needs less food when she is not producing milk. But even so, the number of cattle that could be kept in good health over winter would be limited.

Rather than let the surplus animals starve slowly to death, it would make sense to kill them while they were still in good condition, when some of the meat could be eaten fresh and the rest salted, smoked or dried to be eaten over winter. Hence an annual cattle slaughter in the late autumn would be required for sound agricultural reasons, and could provide a convenient opportunity to honour the gods (and have a big feast) at the same time. The god(s) might change, but the agricultural imperative stayed the same. 

Comments Off on Blotmonath

Filed under The Anglo-Saxon Calendar

Ten Reasons Not to Bank On (or With) Bank of America

Ten Reasons Not to Bank On (or With) Bank of America | Truthout

Ten Reasons Not to Bank

On (or With) Bank of

America

by:
Nomi Prins, Truthout | News Analysis

Bank of America security blocks a photographer during an Iraq War protest in March of 2008. (Photo: Steve Rhodes)

Charging customers for a debit card is just one reason not to bank at BoA. Recent Occupy Santa Cruz Bank of America incident illustrates how sensitive B of A is to protest.  This “too big to fail” bank may collapse like a house made of junk bonds and become a taxpayer burden. Here are a few other reasons why you shouldn’t bank with them.

There is no shortage of hatred for the biggest banks. Indeed, the Occupy Wall Street movement is leading a national revolution against these Byzantine, powerful Goliaths for the economic devastation they have caused. This makes it difficult to choose the worst of the bunch. That said, a strong case can be made that Bank of America deserves the title of the nation’s most despised bank.

Here are ten reasons to take your money out of Bank of America – and park it at a credit union or community bank near you. (And yes, that may be near impossible if you have a mortgage with them, as refinancing away from any big bank nowadays is a nightmare.)

1. B of A rejects the right of customers to protest. When two Occupy Santa Cruz protesters in California marched into a local Bank of America to close their accounts, the response was, “You cannot be a protester and a customer at the same time,” followed by a threat to call the police if the women didn’t leave. (The attending officer  later reiterated the bank manager’s message.) Meanwhile, the fact that Bank of America charges a fee for closing an account prompted Rep. Brad Miller (D-North Carolina), who resides in Bank of America’s headquarters state, to introduce a bill to protect customers from such fees.

2. To recoup ongoing losses from its stupendously dumb acquisitions of Countrywide Financial and Merrill Lynch, B of A pillages its customers. Thus, despite massive public outrage, the $5 debit usage fee for customers with less than a $5,000 balance and no mortgage with the bank will begin in 2012. B of A was the first large bank to confirm it would charge this fee, which is the highest in current discourse among the banks.

On October 18, Consumers Union wrote a letter to B of A chief Brian Moynihan asking him to reconsider this fee, which impacts poorer clients disproportionately. The letter summed it up nicely: “Consumers should not be required to pay a costly fee that appears to be arbitrary and designed to generate income to make up for Bank of America’s bad business decisions rather than covering the costs of providing debit card services.” Banks collect 24 cents from retailers for each customer swipe, much more than the median 8 cents it costs a bank to process the purchase. Senator Dick Durbin’s (D-Illinois) response was to urge customers: “Vote with your feet. Get the heck out of that bank.”

3. B of A’s other fees are just as bad. According to its last annual report, the bank has 29.3 million active online subscribers who paid over $300 billion worth of bills in 2010.  In May, B of A raised its checking account fees, which included e-banking, to $12, in line with JP Morgan Chase’s decision to do the same, up from $8.95 per month. In June, it started a $35 overdraft fee, even on overdrafts of one cent. Next year, it will incorporate basic checking with a new “essentials” account structure that makes monthly fees unavoidable, that will not include free bill pay, and that has a mandatory $6 minimum fee.

Last Monday, Bank of America was charged (along with JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo) with colluding with the two major credit card companies, Visa and MasterCard, to keep ATM fees high; in other words, they were charged with “price-fixing,” in direct opposition to antitrust laws. This is the third of three such suits filed recently, each seeking class action status.

4. Bank of America takes gross advantage of the military.

It is the official bank of the US military and has branches by or on many bases, which provides the firm with another locus of extortion. B of A can entice military personnel to take out loans at usurious rates. Personal loans made to soldiers for a few thousand dollars can actually keep them indebted for the rest of their lives.

Last May, Bank of America paid $22 million to settle charges of improperly foreclosing on active-duty troops. The firm spun these foreclosures as being Countrywide’s fault for having started them before becoming part of B of A.

5. Bank of America is officially rated the biggest, scariest bank. Its stock price also fared the worst of the group of banks (which also included Citigroup and Wells Fargo) when Moody’s Investors Service downgraded it on September 21.

B of A’s long-term holding company (parent bank) rating was chopped two notches to Baa1 from A2, and its retail bank rating was cut two notches from A2 to Aa3, placing B of A four notches below rival JP Morgan Chase and one below Citigroup, the third-largest US bank. Its bank holding company has the lowest rating among the top five banks with the largest derivatives positions.

This caused great fear for investors involved in derivatives trades with the Merrill Lynch division, prompting them to request trades be moved to the part of the bank with the better rating – the retail part with the insured (peoples’) deposits. That way, B of A doesn’t have to pony up as much collateral to back the trades, as it would in a subsidiary with a lower rating. The Fed was recklessly happy to approve, despite the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) misgiving about having to insure more risk, even if it can borrow from the US Treasury to do so. Meanwhile, Bank of America’s stock price got so crushed that Warren Buffett scooped up a $5 billion preferred stock deal, effectively betting that the government won’t let this big bank go bust.

6. B of A’s derivatives position keeps rising. The total amount of derivatives in the FDIC-insured portion of B of A as of mid-year was $53.7 trillion, up 10 percent from $48.9 trillion the prior year, and up nearly 35 percent from its pre-fall crisis level of $40 trillion (the Merrill Lynch securities division holds $22 trillion in addition.) The bank has $5 trillion of credit derivatives, nearly double its $2.7 trillion pre-Merrill amount. In addition, because of its inherent zombie status and rating downgrades, the cost of insuring B of A against a possible default continues to rise in the credit derivatives market – a pattern that American International group (AIG) once followed.

7. Bank of America got the most AIG money of the big depositor banks. By virtue of having acquired Merrill Lynch’s AIG-related portfolio, B of A got to keep approximately $12 billion worth of federal AIG backing, too. It also received more government subsidies than any other mega-bank except Citigroup. Its stimulus package included an initial Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) helping of  $15 billion for the bank and $10 billion for Merrill, plus a second helping of $20 billion in January 2009 after it became clear that Merrill’s losses had spiked to $15 billion – in order to ensure the takeover from hell went through and Fed chairman Ben Bernanke, then-Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, and then-Merrill Lynch executive John Thain could pat themselves on the back for saving the world. The government guaranteed $118 billion in assets, mostly Merrill’s, in the new merged firm. With the benefit of the Fed’s nearly 0 percent money policy, and a depositor base to plunder, B of A repaid that aid.

In terms of overall federal subsidies (including TARP), Bank of America was second only to Citigroup ($230 billion compared to $415 billion). None of that got in the way of former B of A CEO Ken Lewis’ personal take, a $63 million retirement plan, in addition to the $63 million he scored during the three years before his departure.

8. Bank of America leads the big bank fraud lawsuit settlement tally. So far, it has racked up the largest settlement, $8.5 billion in June, to settle claims related to $100 billion worth of Countrywide-spun mortgage securities backed by faulty loans, with bigwig investors like Pimco, BlackRock, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

B of A is also being sued by state and federal regulators for questionable foreclosure practices and a union benefits plan for hiding foreclosure problems that impacted its share price. It is one of 17 major US financial institutions being sued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency for billions of dollars of mortgage-securities-related losses that may require B of A to potentially repurchase $50 billion worth of allegedly fraudulent securities. Earlier this year, B of A settled for $3 billion regarding bad loans that they had repackaged by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as agreed to a $624 million settlement in a securities fraud class-action suit filed by New York Sate and City pension fund regarding Countrywide stock losses. Then there’s AIG’s August lawsuit, in which AIG wants $10 billion in damages for mortgage-related securities it bought and against which it claims B of A committed securities fraud.

That’s a lot of pain for a Federal Reserve-approved $4.1 billion acquisition. Meanwhile, since the settlement didn’t lead to a financial restatement, under the supremely elastic (read: useless) Dodd-Frank Act, executives get to keep their related bonuses.

9. Even after lawsuits, B of A would still rather please investors than customers. Investors that won money in the $8.5 billion settlement were upset that B of A was continuing to service loans, instead of foreclosing on them more quickly. Now, B of A had a nasty incentive to kick people out of homes faster, rather than work with them to refinance or restructure mortgages. Two months later, their foreclosure process has, in fact, sped up.

Bank of America foreclosure notices are surging again following a slight robo-signing- related slowdown, meaning they are now sending out a greater increase in default notices (90-day overdue loans) than other banks. The bank has $30 billion in residential mortgage loans in default, which will become foreclosures for thousands of families.

10. Bank of America, despite having been buoyed up by the government, did not pay taxes, and, given its glorious ineptness, will be laying off 30,000 workers. Not only did the bank pay no federal taxes for 2010 (or 2009) by making use of its posted pre-tax loss of $5.4 billion, it actually cited a tax benefit of $1 billion. Meanwhile, it has announced plans to cut up to 30,000  jobs over the next few years as part of its plan to save $5 billion, ostensibly due to the settlements it’s paying for engaging in upper-management-approved fraud.

Finally, consider the two reasons that any of this list is possible. One is the Glass-Steagall Act repeal, which enables banks to comingle straight costumer business with reckless securities creation and trading. The second reason is coddling by a Fed that finances and approves every bad move. B of A is the poster child for a Glass-Steagall repeal gone wrong. Lewis pulled in a slew of other banks under the B of A umbrella, making it – at one time – the country’s largest bank, including the infamous Countrywide Financial and Merrill Lynch. Now it has $2.26 trillion in total assets and $1.8 trillion assets in insured subsidiaries, $1.2 trillion of customer deposits ($1.066 trillion in the United States) and about $804 billion in FDIC-insured deposits – all part of the giant, risk-laden mess that is B of A.

Without being broken up via a new, strong Glass-Steagall Act, when banks need to find ways to make money, they resort to extorting it from their sitting ducks, er – customers. Meanwhile, that’s where credit unions, which are not-for-profits owned by their members and not by outside shareholders, come in. They generally don’t engage in crazy derivatives trades, or charge unnecessary fees for holding your money or for letting you pay bills with it, or for online banking. In terms of personal attention, among other economic reasons, the credit and smaller community banks are a much better bet.

Comments Off on Ten Reasons Not to Bank On (or With) Bank of America

Filed under News

Police who nearly killed Iraq vet at OCCUPY protests trained by Israeli military

Police who nearly killed Iraq vet at OCCUPY protests trained by Israeli military
By Martin HillLibertyFight.com
10/26/11

The Oakland Police Department, who shot and critically injured an unarmed 24 year old U.S. Marine with a tear gas cannister last night, has placed 2nd only to Israel in “terrorism” training exersizes two years in a row.

Scott Olsen, 24, suffered a fractured skull and brain swelling and is in critical condition as a result of Tuesday’s shooting.

Participating in operation Urban Shield for several years, Oakland PD has come in second place for the last 2 years and won first place in 2009. In a press release issued a week prior to Tuesdays shooting, Oakland PD boasted:“OPD Excels in SWAT Competition– “The Oakland Police Department placed 2nd among SWAT teams in the recently completed Urban Shield 2011 Training Exercise. In its 5th year, Urban Shield is the nation’s premiere tactical training exercise competition that tests the capabilities of first responders. The event is hosted by the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office and has obtained international recognition with representatives coming as far away as Israel and Jordan.”

The full press release can be found here, and reads in part: “The 48 hour event consisted of 30 SWAT teams that competed in sustained exercises that involved 26 realistic training scenarios based on real world threats that were spread across the Bay Area. The scenarios included hostage rescue, maritime/train interdiction, weapons of mass destruction, infrastructure sabotage, and a SWAT fitness assessment. Teams were required to successfully respond to each of the staged scenarios with proper tactics using specialized weapons and equipment. ….Oakland Police Chief Howard Jordan, who attended the closing ceremony, stated “I am extremely proud of the Oakland Police Department’s Tactical Team. They consistently rank among the best performing Tactical Teams in the region.”

In a more subdued statement in wake of criticism over his departments handling of “Occupy” protests, Chief Jordanassured the public that “The City is committed to facilitating peaceful protests and constitutional policing”.

The 2011 police press release also states “The Oakland Police team was made up of eight SWAT team memberswho where led by Sergeants Roland Holmgren and Chris Sansone”. On youtube is an interesting video titled“Roland Holmgren Instigates Oakland Police Brawl. Watch Here, and GET MILITANT COMMERCIAL”

In October 2010, The Oakland Tribune reported “An Oakland police SWAT team finished second in a prestigious, internationally known training competition this past weekend, losing out to a group of Israeli police but beating more than two dozen other Bay Area law enforcement agencies that participated.”

The year prior, Indybay.org reported “URBAN SHIELD 2009 Terrorizing Oakland & Bay Area This Weekend at Invite of Alameda Sheriff”, noting “The exercises include “competitions” between various departments and is funded in large part by ever-flowing Department of Homeland Security dollars that blur whatever lines might have existed between domestic police and national armies.”

Among those listed on the drill’s official website, urbanshield.org, under 2010 Supporting International Agencies / Organizations are “State of Israel National Emergency Management Authority (NEMA)”, “State of Israel National EMS System, Magen David Adom”, and “State of Israel National Police”.

The ADL participated in the first annual Urban Shield Training Exercise in California

Max Blumenthal, in his article ‘The arms firm behind the suppression of #OccupyOakland and Palestine’s popular struggle’ notes “the same company that supplies the Israeli army with teargas rounds and other weapons of mass suppression is selling its dangerous wares to the Oakland police. The company is Defense Technology, a Casper, Wyoming based arms firm…” [See also ‘Palestine in Oakland’ by Adam Horowitz.]

Johannes Mehserle, a former Oakland area BART officer who shot and killed an unarmed subdued man in the back on New Years day 2009, spent only 365 days in jail before he was released.

 

Comments Off on Police who nearly killed Iraq vet at OCCUPY protests trained by Israeli military

Filed under News

Occupy Wall Street Launching First Nationwide General Strike In America Since 1946

 

Occupy Wall Street Launching First Nationwide General Strike In America Since 1946

Occupy Wall Street Launches Nationwide General Strike: First In America Since 1946

Rumors have been flying for a week that the Occupy protesters will be launching a nationwide general strike. We have been biting our tongue waiting for a formal decision.

Mother Jones tweets:

From our reporter at  General Assembly just now MT @timmcdonnell: General strike passes with 1184 votes of approval

JackalAnon tweets:

STRIKE APPROVED FOR NEXT WEDNESDAY! GENERAL STRIKE FIRST TIME IN THE USA SINCE 1946!

(The last American general strike was also in Oakland).

The strike will occur on November 2nd.

Occupy Wall Street in New York has also been considering a proposal for a general strike. And there are also rumors of a global general strike next year.

 

Comments Off on Occupy Wall Street Launching First Nationwide General Strike In America Since 1946

Filed under News

Marine, Navy, Army and Airforce Vets and Police Vow to Protect Innocent Protesters

Marine, Navy, Army and Airforce Vets and Police Vow to Protect Innocent Protesters

 

 

Marine, Navy, Army and Airforce Veterans and Police Vow to Protect Innocent Protesters

In response to the police brutality against peaceful American protesters – here, here, here, here, here and here – military and police groups are forming to protect American citizens.

In fact, many in the military support the protests (and see this).

As of today, OccupyMarines, Occupy Police, Occupy Navy, Occupy Airforce, and Occupy Army have formed to protect the people against police brutality.

After Veterans for Peace member Scott Olsen – a Marine Corps veteran twice deployed to Iraq – was critically wounded in the Occupy Oakland protest, Occupy Marines tweeted:

WHEN YOU SHOOT ONE MARINE, YOU SHOOT AT ALL OF US. OORAH. Do It Peacefully Occupy We Stand In Solidarity

Comments Off on Marine, Navy, Army and Airforce Vets and Police Vow to Protect Innocent Protesters

Filed under News

A Rather Convenient Lie!

The Global Warming-Climate Change Scam !!!

 

Comments Off on A Rather Convenient Lie!

Filed under Uncategorized

More than Taboo

A Film by Ryan Dawson 

Comments Off on More than Taboo

Filed under Zionism

UK census to be abolished


Could our storecards replace the census? Plans unveiled to use data from shops, banks and estate agents

By STEVE DOUGHTY

Last updated at 8:54 AM on 19th October 2011


The historic national census is set to be abolished

The historic national census is set to be abolished

The historic national census is set to be abolished and replaced by information on everybody in the country gathered from banks, stores and estate agents.

The census – first carried out more than 200 years ago amid fears that the number of people in the country was multiplying too fast – has become expensive, inaccurate and slow, the Office for National Statistics admitted.

Instead, it proposed building a picture of the population and how people live through computer records, including databases built up by private sector organisations.

That means that in future information people hand over to banks, to retail chains through their storecards, to energy companies or to mobile phone firms could be bought by the state and used by Whitehall departments, councils and quangos.

The ONS gave its first official admission that the census is likely to go in a consultation paper on its future plans for counting the population called ‘Beyond 2011’.

The title suggests that the census carried out at a cost of £500 million earlier this year will be the last.

It said: ‘All of the signs are that the 2011 census operation has been highly successful but the census is becoming increasingly costly, and changes in society are making it more challenging to carry out.

‘A more mobile population, and the increasingly complex ways in which people live, make the process of census-taking more difficult, and the concept of a snapshot every 10 years less relevant.’

The paper added: ‘At the same time, improvements in technology and the growth of computerised records about people and services, both in the public and private sectors, seem to suggest a possible alternative approach.’

The Daily Mail revealed earlier this year that ONS officials had approached representatives of large private sector companies to test the possibility of getting their customer databases.

One organisation that took part in talks, the Demographic User Group, has members including Tesco, Sainsbury’s, John Lewis, Marks and Spencer, the Co-op, Boots, the lottery operator Camelot, power giant E-ON, phone company Orange and, in the financial sector, Barclays and Nationwide.

All the companies have extensive records on customers, their families, where they live, what they buy, and even the way they use transport through petrol sales records.

Estate agencies have extensive computerised records of housing and rail and bus companies and airlines have customer ticketing records.

Historic: The census was first carried out more than 200 years ago amid fears that the number of people in the country was multiplying too fast

Historic: The census was first carried out more than 200 years ago amid fears that the number of people in the country was multiplying too fast

Private sector material could be combined with the vast databases produced in the public sector, including those of Revenue and Customs, Department of Work and Pension benefits records, NHS and GP rolls, the Valuation Office Agency which records details of homes for council tax valuation, and local councils.

These could provide material on ethnicity, migration and education that could be hard to deduce from private sector records.

The plan for the state to use information given both to public sector agencies and private firms for other purposes is certain to prove highly controversial.

It appears to clash with data protection rules, which may need sweeping reforms if the ONS is to cash in on private databases.

The consultation paper said that assessments of a new census system would take into account ‘public burden and public acceptability’.

Describing computer databases as ‘administrative data’, it added: ‘Although administrative data may be used extensively in future, any data held will be securely stored and tightly controlled so that only results for non-disclosive geographical areas are ever made available.’

Boots could also give away their customer database from storecards

Boots could also give away their customer database from storecards

The first national census was taken in 1801, at a time when politicians and intellectuals feared the population was growing too fast and that a revolution similar to the French upheaval could be inevitable.

It put the population of Britain and Ireland at just over 16 million.

Since then censuses have been held every 10 years, except in the wartime year of 1941.

The death knell for the national census sounded in 2001, when officials tried to give a precise count of the population but missed out a million people.

Population figures had to be manipulated for years afterwards to make up for the errors.

The ONS made its embarrassment worse when it tried to use the excuse that many young people were away on holiday in Ibiza on the day the census was taken. In fact enumerators were hampered by a badly-designed system for returning forms and the reluctance of large numbers of recent immigrants to take part.

This year’s census forms had 918 tick box options over 32 pages, demand details on everything from ethnic identity to how you travel to work and what kind of central heating you have, and booklets to help non-English or Welsh speakers understand them have been produced in 56 languages.

But more information still can be gleaned from storecards. Tesco cards alone are used by 15 million people.

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2050721/UK-census-abolished-replaced-data-shops-banks-estate-agents.html#ixzz1bumNzsZt

UK census to be abolished and replaced by data from shops, banks and estate agents | Mail Onlin

1 Comment

Filed under News

S.Africa supports Palestinian UN statehood bid

 

S.Africa supports Palestinian UN statehood bid

Released on – Wednesday,26 October , 2011 -00:06

South Africa on Tuesday threw its weight behind Palestine’s bid to become a full member of the United Nations and called on the international body to settle the bid quickly.

“South Africa looks forward, sooner (rather) than later, to welcoming Palestine as the 194th member of the United Nations,” the government said in a statement.

“South Africa wishes to reaffirm its conviction: that Palestine is a state, that Palestine is a peace-loving state, and that Palestine is willing and able to carry out its obligations under the Charter of the United Nations.”

Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas made the historic application to a standing ovation in the UN General Assembly in September.

The 15-member Security Council pushed back the bid to a special membership committee to give its verdict.

The United States and Israel, strongly opposing the bid, say only direct Israeli-Palestinian talks can create a Palestinian state.

South Africa, a non-permanent member of the Security Council, accused the Council of being “paralyzed by inaction” in resolving conflict in the Middle East while it acted speedily in dealing with the Arab Spring.

South Africa welcomed a proposal for new peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine brokered by the Mideast Quartet — a group comprising the United States, the United Nations, the European Union and Russia — and called for an agreement before the proposed deadline of end 2012.

At the same time, it condemned Israel’s plan to build 1,100 houses in occupied territories.

“The single major obstacle to the negotiations is clearly the incessant building of illegal settlements by Israel,” the statement read.

Palestine’s bid needs the approval of nine members of the Security Council, but the US has said it will veto the decision.

India, also a non-permanent member of the council, earlier also expressed support for Palestine.

S.Africa supports Palestinian UN statehood bid | MSN Arabia News

Comments Off on S.Africa supports Palestinian UN statehood bid

Filed under News

Bank Overdraft Fees: The Dough Keeps Rolling In

FOCUS | Bank Overdraft Fees: The Dough Keeps Rolling In

By Karen Weise, Bloomberg Businessweek

25 October 11

The bottom line: Despite last year’s rule change on overdraft protection fees, the programs are expected to bring in $16 billion this year for banks.

Banks have spent much of the past year howling about revenue lost after financial reforms limited consumer fees, especially the billions they reaped from charges for covering overdrafts on debit cards. Those programs, though, remain highly profitable. While fee revenue will be down about 16 percent this year from its peak in 2009, it will top $16 billion, predicts Moebs Services, a banking consultancy. “Consumers are still getting hit really hard by overdraft fees,” says Rebecca Borné, an attorney at the Center for Responsible Lending, a consumer advocacy group.

As banks pushed a shift from paper checks to debit cards over the past decade, they began enrolling customers automatically in overdraft protection plans, with charges of as much as $35 for each overdrawn transaction. Banks say that lets the 185 million Americans with debit cards make emergency purchases even if their account is short. Consumers, though, soon discovered that a slice of pizza could cost almost $40 after overdraft fees. Last year the Federal Reserve barred banks from offering overdraft protection on debit-card transactions without prior consent from consumers.

A few banks, including Bank of America and HSBC, have since stopped offering overdraft protection on debit-card purchases. (BofA in September announced a $5 monthly charge for debit cards to make up for lost fee revenue.) Others introduced or expanded overdraft programs. An informal survey by Impact Financial Services, which advises small and midsize banks, polled 150 community banks and found that 70 percent of them now offer overdraft protection, up from about half before the rules went into effect.

Many banks that offer the services have launched aggressive marketing campaigns to get customers to sign up. The banks sent letters and e-mails explaining the changes, at times with alarmist warnings that if they didn’t sign up their card might be rejected when they most need it. Some banks called customers who’d had transactions denied to persuade them to opt in. “We were surprised at the success rate,” says Jefferson Harralson, a bank analyst at research firm Keefe, Bruyette & Woods.

The marketing campaigns also succeeded in sowing confusion. A survey by the Center for Responsible Lending showed that 60 percent of consumers who chose overdraft protection did so in part to avoid penalties if their debit cards were denied, even though such fees don’t exist. Similarly, two-thirds said they signed up to sidestep charges for bounced checks, which actually are covered under different programs.

Many banks still engage in one highly criticized overdraft practice: reordering purchases to process the largest ones first, instead of in chronological order. That means a big purchase may be approved, but customers could face overdraft charges for several small transactions. Banks that do this say consumers prefer the reordering because larger transactions are often the most important. A federal judge in California shot down that logic last year in a class action against Wells Fargo, calling it “utterly speculative.” He ordered the bank to pay consumers $203 million for what he called the “bone-crushing multiplication of additional overdraft penalties.” Wells Fargo says it is appealing the ruling, and it now processes transactions in the order they happened.

Weise is a reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek.

Comments Off on Bank Overdraft Fees: The Dough Keeps Rolling In

Filed under News